Summer Essay

The stars are getting higher and harder, the air more acrid at the back of my throat and the flame tree fringes are starting to flash amber: Autumn is finally coming after the longest, most glorious Summer I have ever spent in Melbourne.

After the intensity of my thesis, and subsequent writing and conferencing, this Summer has been all about getting out of my mind and immersing in the physical and social world. I started working as a postie delivering mail everyday, lived in a beautiful mansion with 7 of the coolest people I know, started Open Table with my friends, hosted couch surfers, gone to yoga so much my teacher calls me rubber back and have not read a single academic book or paper.

During this time I have been writing short bursts in my diary, and in the tradition of Mary Schminch, I’m eschewing fears of being a self-indulgent twat and sharing them… Starting from… now:

• Enjoy life as a series of beautiful moments.

• Tell your friends that you love them as often as you can.

• Tell bad jokes frequently. Try and remember the punch-line before launching in. If you can’t remember the punch line laugh anyway.

• Remember that you are going to die one day. Live like that day is tomorrow.

• Don’t be cavalier with traffic. Bike vs Car scuffles have predictable casualties.

• Wear brightly coloured socks. It will make your colleagues smile.

• Look at people in the eyes. Ask questions. Listen. Really understanding someone is a deeply satisfying human experience.

• Caring about status is a colossal waste of time: people who you think you are too cool for may be the ones who open your mind the most; people who you think are too cool for you may actually really want to spend time with you.

• Don’t waste time curating photos of yourself on facebook. The popular girls from high school are too busy constructing heir own digital farces to care about yours.

• Sleep with your phone on flight-mode.

• Call in sick and go to the beach when the weather is good.

• Make jam. Label the burnt batches ‘caramelised’. Give the good batches to your neighbours.

• Write your neighbours letters. Try not to get issued with restraining orders.

• People get sick. People die. People will tell you they have cancer via facebook. This will be horrible, but at least you are now pre-warned.

• Cook for your housemates when they least expect it. Clean up at least 10% more mess than you made.

• Read poetry.

• Sing out loud while riding your bike. By the time people realise what you are doing, you will be too far away to see their reactions.

• Kiss like you are in love. Fall in love. Enjoy every beautiful moment. Always say good-bye, like it is the last time that you will ever see your lover.

• Things never turn out how you imagine, but what ever happens somehow manages to be exactly right for you, right now. Don’t waste time cursing serendipity.

• Don’t waste time dismissing everything that ever came from religion. Intelligent people worked for centuries on religious texts, they can be a useful short cut to living a good life.

• Think about what living a good life means for you. Experiment with the contribution you can make to the world.

• Watching Beyoncé videos is a valid contribution. So is ‘dancing’ along.

• Email people that you admire. Tell them why. Beyoncé writes back to fan mail.

• Keep your possessions to a minimum. Things only slow you down.

• Practice non-violence. Be vegetarian.

• Throw wild vegetarian dinner parties on Tuesday nights.

• Drink wine on the veranda.

• Text your parents at 3am to tell them that you love them. They probably already think you have a few screws loose.

• Have a chat with the homeless lady outside Aldi. Do not give her beer in a glass bottle.

• Shave your head at least once in your lifetime. Know that you probably won’t look as good as Natalie Portman. But at least you tried.

• Remember that you are not morally superior to anyone. Even if you are vegetarian and look like Natalie Portman with a shaved head. Humility is so hot right now. And always.

• See things from as many perspectives as you can. Make friends with people who have different backgrounds to you. They see the world in interesting and different ways.

• Host couch surfers.

• ‘Them’ is an illusion. There is only ‘Us’. The more strangers you meet, the more you know this to be true.

• Know that helping others is the only way to be happy.

• Never pretend to have the answers. Even if you do, life is much more fun lived in experimentation.

 

Thank you for indulging these brain blurts, I loved every minute of writing. Like Mary Schminch I absolutely encourage everyone to try writing a personal essay. Such a fun and faux wizened way to spend a lazy Sunday morning.

Bladibladibla predictably I’m off to India to practice Ashtanga Yoga. I am still unsure about what my future holds after that. I know that my PhD is lurking there somewhere and I am nearly ready to embrace it with my newly flexible arms.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Avoiding generalisations: theory is dead

Is thinking about the world in abstract, generalised terms useful? What is the point of spending years arguing over nuanced and sophisticated understanding of society? Does applied theory exist? To make theory ‘work’ do you have to add too many factors, caveats and contextual consideration to actually be generalised? Does anyone, even elite professors, really understand theory? Is ‘understanding’ theory valuable?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Pursuit of wisdom

Since starting this academic caper I am constantly surprised at how much I really don’t know. There’s more research after a PhD?!? It takes six months to publish an article?!? The study on Balinese cocktailology got funding?!? The more I know, the more I know I don’t know, yet the unknowing cultivates an appetite for knowledge and to me it seems that having a whole life to explore wisdom frontiers is one of the most luxurious affordances of our world.

The pursuit of wisdom so far has been signposted with some very inspiring characters, and after an immersive encounter with several during last week’s Beyond Behaviour Change symposium at RMIT I am feeling tipsy with ideas and my fingers are champing to spill impressions.

Beyond Behaviour Change is easily the most intimidating conference I have ever had a paper accepted at. Twenty-five world leading social theorists from Australia, Denmark, America and England presenting on sustainability transitions. Elizabeth Shove, Yolande Strengers, Gordon Walker, Cecily Maller and Theodore Schatzki together for three intense days. These thinkers are inspiridating in myriad ways, not only for their proliferation of seminal social concepts since before I was born, but also for their fresh and relevant worldviews. During the course of the symposium I felt humbled and encouraged by the interest, humility and patience that the big kids in social practice theories extended to each other, and the constructive feedback lavished on the younger generation of researchers.

I was also happily awed at the positive outlook and the humility of these doyens, outside the professional realm. The more important the person, the less important and blustery the demeanour. Theodore Schatzki (pictured) epitomises this; one of the most widely cited social practice theorist, he was perhaps the most unassuming, generous and encouraging with his comments. This is an impression I cherish, and hope like him, to both contribute in meaningful ways to sustainability discourse and also inspire the same confidence and motivation in future researchers being born today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More InDensity

One of the things that impressed me most about Europe is the cosmopolitan lifestyle. Cafés on every corner, parks, bike-lanes, families outside – the cities feel so vibrant and alive.  I think one of the reasons that this is possible is the urban density; mid-rise apartments mean that more families can live closer together, and support more small shops and restaurants and thus fuel the vibrancy.  Density also means more frequent public transport, more hospitals, more libraries, and more schools within walking distance.

Some would say that living in an ‘ant-hill’ is unAustralian and grumbling about pollution move further out, clinging to the house and yard dream/fallacy.  However the suburban lifestyle is drifting further away from utopia with limited public transport and longer commutes leading to lack of access to everyday conveniences, community facilites, less free time, higher rates of obesity and can be extremely isolating.

After seeing how dynamic, clean and healthy city living can be I am all for increasing density in Australia.  Next time an apartment block is proposed nearby, don’t be a nimby, just think ‘Awesome more small shops, more bike-lanes, public transport, schools, hospitals, libraries and public spaces!’

If you get super excited about it you can email your local member for urban planning. Or even  liveable.cities@infrastructure.gov.au to let them know what you think.

Here are some of my European apartment living photos.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Why Wash Cold

“Why Wash Cold? It’s simple. Save Energy. Reduce CO2. Save Money.”
– Parsons Fashion Marketing and Communication Design Students 2011

An amazing student video that tackles some environmental issues around washing. Contains nudity.

Wash Cold from 560 Parsons Fashion on Vimeo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Laundry Aisles

At the beginning of the year I took a series of photographs of laundry aisles all around Melbourne.  I had totally forgotten that I had them until Charlotte told me about a series of photos she took of supermarket lighting. These photos were taken during my fascination with cleanliness in Australian everyday life.

Posted in my work | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hipster Hobo in Malmö

I stayed with some friends of mine in Malmö last May after presenting at ERSCP.  While I was there Matthias asked me if I would like to help with Soppa för Värme, the soup kitchen that he is part of, and of course I agreed camera in hand.  We rode our bikes to pick up left over soup from fancy hotels, and day old bread, and then set up with some of his friends in a local square and served up the treats.   There was also a guitarist playing lively music, and a woman giving free haircuts.  The people who came to eat had a great sense of community and were kind enough to speak to me in English, I was even proposed to by one particularly rakish codger.  Here are some of the photos from that day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Charmpits

Out of ALL the parallel universes – how on earth did we end up on the one where women devote hours, fortunes and endure torturous pain to keep our armpits hair less? How do we cross over to Universe Charmpit where women are jubilantly curly?

This post was inspired by Emer O’Toole who wrote a piece in the Guardian newspaper about this issue.

Thanks for the beautiful image Sian Winters.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Collective Agency & Institutions, Sustainability, and the Capability Approach

I was in Leipzig for a workshop on Collective Agency, which was very inspiring and thought provoking, and I wanted to share all of the discussions here, but they were so proliferate and sometimes disparate that I am going to focus on one standout presentation by Christoph Görg.  He gave a super clear and relevant account of global society, societal individuals and the natural environment – I haven’t scribbled that hard since first year uni, and I’m pretty sure I have his whole presentation verbatim. They say that if you can’t explain something simply you don’t know enough about it, and while I definitely don’t know enough about social theory, hopefully his words can make the history and environmental implications of social theory clearer.

Görg started with Giddens 1984 theory of structuration pitching structure vs agency and society vs individual.  He then shared some of his concerns about the ways that this translates to the real world, namely: ontological, methodological and ethical.  He felt that social structures compel adherence but ignore the rights of the individuals (like women not having the right to vote), so he felt that while methodologically structuration was an applicable way to understand the world, ethically he felt that individuals need more freedom.

He then pit Durkheim’s 1892 view that individuals exist within institutions without being able to ignore or change them, against Weber’s 1922 view of individuals as ‘subjective intended meaning and action’ creating and reproducing the structures within which we operate. But concluded that this was a false dichotomy and that ‘structuration’ offered a bridge between the structure agency standoff.

Structuration, he posed, has a dual nature: not only constraining but also enabling. The bulk of daily life plays out as routines, but with reflexive monitoring of actions that opens individuals to shape their own routines ‘deliberately’.  He sees institutions as being constructed through actions (including meaning, resources, rules, legitimisation, etc.) but also institutions as being comprised and dependant on societal individuals (religion, economy, policy, law etc. is built up of many little cases).

From this Görg concluded that research needs to incorporate a more bridged view of structure and agency: that structure influences agency, but that visa versa is also true. That there is no mutual exclusion between individuals and society. And that research would do well to consider societal individuals as a central figure. To achieve this he suggested a ‘relational’ approach toward structure and agency, but also cautioned to take constraints/influences seriously, acknowledging the ‘society produced and producing individuals’ who then steer society, in a never ending cycle.

Routines are not restricted to reproduction, but salient moments of purposeful performance in personally aesthetic ways.’

Which lead him into a discussion of power.  He felt that it necessary to distinguish the degree of influence and freedom, and of decisive power of individuals in finding ways to see the interaction between systems and actions. (An example of a powerful individual would be a style leader who everyone tries to emulate, or policy maker that creates rules, each on is inside their systems, but has a greater degree of control over that system).

He followed this with a picture that showed the interdependencies of nature, society and the individual, titled ‘Critical Theory of Society’.  Google images wouldn’t fetch me a copy so apologies for my rough sketch below.

From this he followed that ‘non-intended’ side effects of individuals within (and against) structures can inadvertently undermine social or ecological conditions. While he ascribed individuals system-steering agency, he though a lack of a systems view posed a barrier to positive outcomes.  His suggestion for individual and collective action was to choose an appropriate scale; local, national or global, seek to understand that system and then apply pressure in ways that would have benefits to nature, society and individuals.  He urged the propelling global society and societal individual to draw support from structures but to be open and responsive to input from passionate individuals.‘Collective capability can create structures that allow for agency.’

For me it was really interesting to hear him string the old school social theorists together and then work out why society and sustainability aren’t really on speaking terms at the moment. But if nothing else – perhaps a fun dinner party conversation? I’ll bring the wine.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Urban Archeology

I spent the last few days in Leipzig. While there I met the owner of Kaffee Schwartz, Raymond Romanos, who introduced me to some of the issues facing East Germany. He told me about the initially drastic, now steady drift west, and Leipzig’s abandoned apartment conundrum.  Because so many people left their state appropriated dwellings no one really knows who these buildings belong to, and without the population to fill them they are falling to decay. There are government efforts to invigorate these spaces, and I stumbled into so many cute Frühstück pay by donation restaurants, and saw plenty of people making live performance art, whole buildings filled with artist studios and so many cute shops and cafés. I heard about friends buying whole buildings for €20,000 to make them over together. There is a vibrant aliveness to Leipzig, but it is hard to temper the still nearly 50,000 empty apartments.

I wanted to see some of these buildings for myself, so asked a friend to take me on an urban archaeology expedition.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment